« Listokin and Taibleson on Credit Rating Agencies | Main | The First Casualty of Debate is Ignorance »
January 17, 2010
Warren on Securities Regulation
has posted An Essay on Rule 506 of Regulation D; Its Questionable Origins, Regulatory Oblivion and Judicial Revitalization on SSRN with the following abstract:
This
essay, based on the author’s presentation last September to the annual
meeting of the North American Securities Administration Association
(NASAA), addresses several issues related to Rule 506, the most
widely-used of the SEC’s transactional exemptions from federal
registration of securities offerings. First, the essay questions the
validity of Rule 506, given its claimed statutory base in Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933. Second, the essay reaffirms the burden
of proof required of issuers on the functionally equivalent issues of
preemption and exemption following the metamorphosis of Rule 506
securities to “covered securities” under the National Securities Market
Improvement Act of 1996. The essay concludes with suggested regulatory
and statutory solutions aimed at restoring the preventive authority of
the states in combating securities fraud in their local marketplaces.
This restoration would certainly be concordant with the Obama
Administration’s directive last spring to all federal departments and
agencies to respect the vital role of the states in the pursuit of
their regulatory prerogatives, and, thusly, to strengthen the core
principles of federalism.
ECC
January 17, 2010 in Securities Markets, Securities Regulation | Permalink
