« Will the new SEC rules for 2010 put your board leadership at greater risk? | Main | Casey on Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Honest Services Fraud »
January 29, 2010
Nees on Citizens United
Anne Tucker Nees has posted Politicizing Corporations: A Corporate Law Analysis of Corporate Personhood and First Amendment Rights after Citizens United on SSRN with the following abstract:
From
derivative suits to the derivative speech rights recognized in Citizens
United, the watershed 2010 Supreme Court opinion overturning
regulations on corporate political speech in the form of independent
expenditures, our law
takes inconsistent stances on how corporations speak, on whose behalf,
and for whose benefit. The question of corporate personhood is central
to the determination of corporations’ claim to First Amendment rights.
The evolution of corporate personhood culminating in the Citizens
United opinion holding that the First Amendment recognizes no
distinctions between individual and corporate speakers can be
juxtaposed to the development of corporate law
in areas such as derivative suits, the proxy process, and SEC
regulations which recognize the complexity of corporate speech due to
its various stakeholders. Additionally, an analysis of corporate law
leads to the conclusion that when corporations speak, it is speech of
an economic, not a political nature due to corporations’ singular
fidelity to profit maximization. Citizens United leaves unexamined
questions such as how economic speech should be treated in the
marketplace of political speech. From a corporate law
perspective, Citizens United leaves shareholders, particularly those of
mutual funds, without meaningful control over how their investments are
utilized in the political arena, placing such investors in the unhappy
position of potentially choosing between political integrity and
economic gain. Further blurring the lines between economic and
political interests for corporations and shareholders undermines both
the First Amendment principals supposedly advanced in Citizens United
and tenants of corporate law
that, like our political system, seek to appropriately balance the
competing and distinct interests of the corporation as an entity, its
management (directors and officers), and its shareholders.
ECC
January 29, 2010 | Permalink
