« GM Numbers: New Plan Does Not Make Economic Sense | Main | Hedge Funds Back in the Black »
June 3, 2009
363 Sales in Bankrutpcy
The Chrysler bankruptcy and now the GM bankruptcy feature 363 sales. I have written briefly on this before, This deserves the careful attention of more than a few blog entries. Chapter 11 features, features, a well tested "plan approval" procedure. First, managers, and it that fails, then groups of investors, propose a "plan" for the reorganization of the bankrupt company. The plan compromises the claims of the lower tranches of debt (usually turning debt into equity and giving shareholders a token residual equity position for their shares) so that the company becomes solvent (the operating profit now can pay the remaining debt obligations on time). The bankruptcy judge must be convinced the plan is viable (or he will send the company into Chapter 7, a liquidation) and divides the investors into classes. Those classes whose claims are "impaired" by the plain -- they are not receiving full payment on their obligations -- vote by class on the plan (the vote seeks two majorities, one by number of creditors voting and one by the amount of the claims being voted). Some secured creditors, with high priority, may not vote because they are not impaired. If enough classes vote in favor, the judge has the option of "cramming down" the plan on those classes that do not. If the plan "passes," the company emerges from Chapter 11. A 363 sale is an emergency sale of the company, proposed by management and approved by the judge, before any plan has been proposed, let alone passed. A 363 sale can be an end run around the entire Chapter 11 procedure. Once the company is sold, the Chapter 11 turns into an Chapter 7 -- the proceeds of the deal are the only thing left to do for the court. Over twenty years ago, the Circuit Courts recognized that a 363 sale was a method of avoiding Chapter 11 procedures and thus they restricted the process with a threshold -- the assets must be time sensitive (like vegetables in a railroad car). Here we see the government doing the same thing -- they are avoiding the Chapter 11 procedure, to avoid the claims of those pesky creditors that are not going along with the government's version of the a workout, by selling the companies first and quickly in 363 sales. The argument is that the companies must move quickly or lose all their customer. Yet last month was both companies best sales month in several months -- after the bankruptcies were either announced or known. These 363 sales are, in essence, total cram downs without a vote. The danger? Managers sell the company cheap to reward themselves and their go along creditor buddies (read, the UAW and the government as debt holder here). Bankruptcy judges, eager to avoid a year of hearings and decisions, and eager to "save" jobs of employees by keeping the company doors open, have a strong incentive to go alone. In these cases, first Fiat and now a Chinese company (and the government itself in buying the "new GM") are getting too sweet a deal in these 363 sales. In the government's case, the sweet deal is an avoidance of the difficult question of whether the "new GM" will survive - whether it should be thrown into a Chapter 7. Taxpayers and unsecured, non-union creditors are taking the hit. The bankruptcies should go through the full plan process. Old time test procedures work -- new emergency reasons to avoid them are -- well, trouble in river city.
June 3, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01156fc5c4fe970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 363 Sales in Bankrutpcy:
Comments
While I agree that the problem with a judicial sale, any judicial sale for that matter under 363 or otherwise, is the risk of a sweetheart deal, I wouldn't consider 363 to be such a direct alternative to a Chapter 11 plan.
The approval conditions for Chapter 11 are distributional justice oriented, not amount oriented. The standard for impairment is not "is the entire claim paid?" as the post seems to imply, but "is the creditor getting at least as much as the creditor would have gotten under a Chapter 7?" Typically, all secured creditors and priority creditors are paid in full; shareholders and subordinated debt gets nothing or a token amount unless new value is provided; and general creditors are bargining in the shadow of equal distributions for equal debts that would have been the rule in Chapter 7.
The whole point of a typical Chapter 11 is to favor creditors whose continued happiness is necessary for a continued reorganization (like trade creditors and employees) at the expense of those who are not -- like bond holders. The creditors who are hurt by the unfair distribution have to vote by a majority of the value in the class to approve the favorable treatment of the other, typically trade, creditors. Usually, the reason that impaired general creditors do this is because they believe that the return on an impaired equity stake in the long run, which gives those general creditors a piece of the going concern value of the company, is preferrable to cash in the full amount of their share of liquidation value now.
A 363 sale of a business unit perserves going concern value, without itself requiring a creditor to reduce the percentage of the total that the creditor would have received in a Chapter 7 at which mere liquidation value, not as a going concern, was secured. The larger the share of the business sold in a 363 sale, the less room management has to favor trade creditors at the expense of creditors with no ongoing business relationship with the company like bondholders.
The way to protect creditors from the risk of a sweetheart deal in a 363 sale, or in any other judicial sale, is to require that the assets be sold in a fair auction open to qualified buyers. The GM proposals for the Hummer division to a Chinese company (and probably the Opel division to a Canadian/Russian/governmental consortium and Saab divisions and possibly the Saturn division as well), certainly appear to meet this test.
In the case of Chrysler, it isn't obvious that there was a competitive bid, although it also isn't obvious that anyone else was interested in buying the company.
Posted by: ohwilleke | Jun 3, 2009 12:56:23 PM
The above situations are most likely some of the few reasons as to why companies fail and later go bankrupt. For a company to work and be successful, there are many factors that contribute to this. The list could include detailed preparation, careful planning, capable leadership, efficient workers, enough clients, proper funding, the right creditors, and good business. Oftentimes, if these factors are not complete or if one of these factors is missing, then the company will possibly start spiraling down or, worse even, file bankruptc
Posted by: Toronto Personal Injury | Jun 9, 2009 8:09:36 AM
Do you happen to know of any academic articles on this subject? I'm an economist who is thinking of writing something up based on the court's (make that "courts') apparent missing of the point in the Chrysler sale.
Posted by: Eric Rasmusen | Jun 11, 2009 9:42:54 AM
So when the Court announces that the government owns 61% of GM we have to ask ourselves "of what?"
Posted by: Barbara | Jul 10, 2009 8:35:13 PM
