Blog Editors



Contributing Editor



News Readers & Feeds
FeedBurner Subscription Service
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog:


Powered by FeedBlitz
View Recent Posts from Network Blog Feeds

Search This Blog

Disclaimer
The material and information contained on this blog is for academic and educational purposes only. No representation is made about the accuracy of the information. By using this blog site you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Transmission or receipt of information contained in this web site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Furthermore, transmission or receipt of any correspondence will not create an attorney-client relationship between you and any author of this blog. No assurance is given that any correspondence, via e-mail or otherwise, between you and any author will be secure or treated as confidential or privileged. Please do not send any author any confidential or privileged information. This blog site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney. Should the reader of this blog need legal advice or require an answer to a specific question, such advice be sought from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to serve as an advertisement or solicitation of legal or other business. In particular, the author does not intend or desire to solicit through this blog the business of anyone in any state or other jurisdiction where this web site, or the use thereof, may not be in compliance with any law or ethical rule.The material contained on this blog represents the personal views of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization that any author is affiliated with or with the views of any other author whom might post on this blog.

Blog Traffic

Since May 2, 2005

Blogware

Powered by TypePad

Notices

© Copyright All Rights Reserved
Contact post author for permissions

« OffShore Trusts | Main | SEC Throws in the Towel on Hedge Fund Registration »

August 5, 2006

Levitt's Call for a Unified SEC/CFTC

Arthur Levitt's editorial in the Wall Street Journal today called for, among other things, a unified SEC/CFTC.  It sounds good but assumes that government agencies work better than they do.  We are better off having two agencies that compete with each other and keep each other honest, just as we are better off with state attorney's general keeping the SEC honest.  One federal agency with control over all securities market regulation and prosecution is a recipe for one agency that is self-righteous and inflexible.  What we have is better than what he wants.

August 5, 2006 in Corporate Governance | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8345db0d669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Levitt's Call for a Unified SEC/CFTC:

Comments

Regulatory agencies don't compete: they expand and waste resources investigating overlapping jurisdictions.

For example, in business opportunity fraud there are at least 3 federal agencies which "compete": the FTC, US Postal, and the DOJ. None of this competition has helped reduce fraud.

Posted by: michael webster | Aug 5, 2006 1:42:46 PM

Post a comment