Tuesday, June 23, 2015

LOT Hack

Polish national carrier, LOT Airlines, temporarily suspended service on Sunday because of an external attack on its computer systems. International aviation's various security treaties are often cited as a model for an international cybersecurity regime (see Hathaway, et al, The Law of Cyber-Attack). Presumably this attack would be covered by the 1971 Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation or its 1988 Supplementary Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, but without more specific information about the attack it is difficult to assess the legal implications with certainty. The 1971 Convention covers acts that seriously endanger the safety of an aircraft while in flight, including damaging air navigation facilities or interfering with the operation of an aircraft. It would seem a good case could be made to include disruption of the computer system that produces flight plans for the operation of aircraft, which is reportedly what took place, under those categories. Even so, this incident should provide sufficient incentive for the international civil aviation community should to examine how well the existing security conventions cover all forms of attack on airline computer systems, even those less directly connected to the operation of aircraft.

June 23, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Follow Up on Recent News Events

There were multiple developments today in news stories about which we have recently blogged, so we have decided to include a brief list of links to keep readers up-to-date on these items:

  • Portugal has chosen the investor group led by Azul's David Neeleman as the winning bidder for TAP. The group will be acquiring a controlling stake of 61 percent, so there are undoubtedly some European partners within the investment group to avoid running afoul of foreign ownership limits.
  • Ryanair says it will appeal the latest order by the UK Competition and Markets Authority to sell its stake in Aer Lingus, and suggested that it will likely wait to make a decision on selling to IAG until after the EU competition authorities have probed the deal.
  • Aviation officials in the EU and U.S. are struggling to determine how to better avoid a tragedy similar to the recent Germanwings 9525 crash. The EU appears to be giving stronger consideration to mental screening requirements, though it is possible the rules would be directed at flight schools and not airlines. U.S. officials sound more skeptical of additional mandated medical screenings, and are instead searching for ways to better facilitate self-reporting by pilots.

June 11, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

EPA Proposes Endangerment Finding for Aircraft Emissions

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that it is proposing to find that greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft engines contribute to air pollution that endangers public health and welfare. In doing so, the EPA is acting under the authority provided it by Section 231 of the Clean Air Act, which directs the agency to study emissions from aircraft and to issue standards to control emissions "which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare." Such a finding has long been seen as inevitable. In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse gas emissions were covered air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Subsequently, the EPA has found that greenhouse gases endangered public health and welfare when emitted by motor vehicles, leaving little basis to assert that these gases would not endanger public health and welfare when emitted by aircraft.

The EPA has, however, held off on issuing an endangerment finding until now, choosing to first act on emissions from other sectors such as motor vehicles, trucking, and power plants. This delay in addressing aircraft emissions, which has been challenged in court by environmental groups, is likely primarily attributable to the airline industry's relatively minor contributions to total greenhouse gas emissions compared to those other sectors. But a secondary reason for the timing of today's announcement is readily apparent from reading the text of the EPA's statement, a desire not to get ahead of ICAO. The EPA has joined the FAA in representing the U.S. at ICAO's deliberations over the development of international standards for greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft, which are scheduled for release next year. An endangerment finding is just a preliminary step the EPA must take before developing and issuing rules restricting aircraft emissions. The EPA's announcement today made clear that this endangerment finding is intended to lay the groundwork for the EPA to issue domestic rules conforming to the international standards agreed upon within ICAO. There is no indication at this point that the EPA intends to go any further in restricting aircraft emissions than the eventual international standards. A detailed account of the EPA's reasoning and analysis can be found here.

June 10, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

FAA Expresses Skepticism About Anti-tampering Measures

Bloomberg is reporting that the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has advised the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) that it does not believe it is feasible to make black box recorders or other cockpit electronics impervious to pilot tampering. The FAA's primary concern, according to the report, is that pilots need to retain the ability to turn off certain electronic components in the event of a fire or other electronics malfunction. The issue of pilot misconduct has received increased attention following the disappearance of Malaysia Air Flight 370 and the crash of Germanwings Flight 9525.

June 9, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, June 8, 2015

TAP Bidding Shows Lack of Concern for Foreign Ownership Rules

The Portuguese government appears to be proceeding with the sale of national carrier TAP despite the legal concerns about the bidding process that emerged last week. While the procedural improprieties raised by the administrative court are believed to be minor, a second area of potential legal concern has received less attention. The two leading bidders competing to acquire a controlling interest in the airline are investors associated with Latin American carriers Azul and Avianca. The European Union's requirement that community carriers be majority-owned by nationals of a European Union Member State would presumably prevent either of these bidders from obtaining the full 61 percent stake the Portuguese government is auctioning off. Foreign ownership and/or control would also endanger TAP's ability to operate international routes under Portugal's bilateral air services agreements  as well as the multilateral agreements to which Portugal is a party through its EU membership.

What explains the seeming lack of concern over TAP's likely sale to a non-European interest? In all likelihood, both the Portuguese government and the prospective buyers are confident a deal can be structured to evade the foreign ownership rules. Evidence of this attitude can be seen in a Wall Street Journal story from last week reporting that if Azul's investors, if successful in their bid for TAP, would keep the two airlines separate "for legal reasons" and coordinate their operations through an alliance. Local partners can probably be found to ensure sufficient European ownership of TAP, or perhaps the winning bidder will be content to take a 49 percent stake and exert significant managerial influence as Etihad has done with some of its recent European investments. Creative work-arounds such as these have become increasingly prevalent throughout international aviation. At some point policy makers need to consider the utility of maintaining foreign ownership restrictions that are only loosely enforced and add layers of complexity onto airlines' corporate structures to preserve a fiction of legal compliance.

June 8, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Regulatory Restructuring in Thailand

A useful example of the ability of the international community to pressure a non-compliant state into reforms is currently underway in Thailand. Earlier this year, an ICAO audit revealed deficiencies in the country's safety oversight. That finding has jeopardized the ability of Thai carriers to operate charter flights to Japan and China, leading to a memorandum of understanding under which the Thai government will submit its reform proposals to the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau for review. The current plans for restructuring the Thai Department of Civil Aviation involve the creation of a separate airports authority and safety and licensing regulator, potentially funded by a direct levy on Thai carriers. Thailand appears to be feeling added pressure because of upcoming inspections planned by the U.S. FAA in July and another ICAO audit, this time of Thailand's aviation security practices, next year.

June 4, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Court Suspends TAP Sale

The Supreme Administrative Court of Portugal issued an injunction earlier today against the government's plan to sell national carrier TAP on the grounds that the government had failed to follow proper procedure under Portuguese law by neglecting to have the airline's finances independently evaluated. The government reportedly hopes to seek relief from the ruling and move forward with this plan accept bids this Friday.

June 3, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Brazil Scraps Plan for Regional Aviation Subsidies

According to a Bloomberg report, Brazil will not be moving forward with a proposal to subsidize operations to underserved airports and provide financing to regional airports. The plan had been under discussion by Brazilian officials for the past year, but budgetary concerns appear to have convinced the government to shelve the idea for at least the near-term.

June 2, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, June 1, 2015

European Commission Questions German Compliance with EU Airport Security Monitoring Standards

Citing concerns about substandard oversight of airport security procedures by the German government, the European Commission has referred Germany to the EU Court of Justice for noncompliance with EU Regulation 300/2008. The EC was careful to state that it has no evidence that actual security practices at German airports have been inadequate, but that it believes the frequency and scope of monitoring by German authorities does not comport with EU requirements.

June 1, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

IAG One Step Closer to Aer Lingus Takeover

The Irish government has decided to support the sale of it's 25 percent stake in national carrier Aer Lingus to International Consolidated Airlines Group (IAG). All eyes now turn to Ryanair, Aer Lingus' largest shareholder and itself the source of multiple takeover bids. If Ryanair also decides in favor of an IAG takeover, the deal will likely move forward subject to competition review.

May 27, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, May 21, 2015

China to Introduce Safety Audit System

The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) reportedly will begin assigning safety ratings to all foreign carriers serving Chinese airports, with the possibility of revoking licenses of carriers with low scores. The carriers will be evaluated on their accident histories, regulatory compliance, and any safety complaints. It is not yet clear how the CAAC intends to compile the data on which it will be basing its evaluations, though an early guess is that it will rely on information obtained through ICAO's Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme. There has been no indication yet that the CAAC intends to perform its own ramp inspections as the European Union does or audits of foreign aviation regulators as are performed by the United States.

May 21, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Monday, May 18, 2015

INTRANSLAW Zagreb 2015

The University of Zagreb Faculty of Law and the Croatian Academy of Legal Sciences invite you to attend the First International Transport and Insurance Law Conference – INTRANSLAW Zagreb 2015, on October 15 and 16.  The conference will gather everyone who deals with issues in this sector – academically or professionally – and will feature presentations, panel discussions, and speeches by internationally recognized scholars and professionals.  The goal is to create a forum for an academic and professional discussion of EU Transport Law and the numerous topical issues related to this wide, complex and dynamic legal field, particularly considering Croatia’s recent accession to EU membership and the necessary harmonization of its local laws with the legal regime of the EU.

There is still time for professionals who wish to make presentations to apply with their abstracts, and the Conference is open to everyone as a listener.  Early bird registration ends June 1st.  Details are available here:  www.intranslaw.eu.


May 18, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, May 14, 2015

International Aviation Law Institute Welcomes Fulbright Scholar

The International Aviation Law Institute (IALI) at DePaul University College of Law welcomes Dr. Sarah Jane Fox from Coventry University in England who will be joining us this fall as a Fulbright Scholar. Dr. Fox holds a PhD in law from the University of Northumbria and specializes in free movement and transport policy.

IALI Executive Director Stephen Rudolph offered the following thoughts:

“We welcome Dr. Fox to DePaul Law and the Institute, and we look forward to working with her on critical aviation issues that touch on international law, policy, and diplomacy.  Her presence will enable us to broaden our research agenda and deepen our commitment to study civil aviation governance at the international level.  We’re also honored that the US-UK Fulbright Commission chose to recognize Dr. Fox and her work, as well as the importance and vitality of this area of scholarship.”

May 14, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

EC Accepts SkyTeam Commitments

The European Commission has concluded its antitrust proceedings into the joint venture by members of the SkyTeam alliance, accepting the commitments proposed by KLM/Air France, Delta, and Alitalia last year. These commitments, which are now legally binding, include slot usage on routes connecting Rome, Amsterdam, and New York, as well as providing competitors access to the carriers' frequent flyer programs. This concludes the EC's investigation into the third and final of the major global alliances, having already accepted commitments from oneworld and Star in 2010 and 2013 respectively.

May 13, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Monday, May 11, 2015

Chicago Welcomes New Aviation Commissioner

Ginger Evans, formerly of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, has been introduced as the new aviation commissioner for the blog's home city of Chicago.

May 11, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

FAA Attempts to Work with Drone Users

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been a frequent subject of criticism for its cautious approach to integration of civilian unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the nation's airspace. The agency has recently been addressing some of those concerns. Approximately six weeks ago, the FAA introduced a "blanket" Certificate of Authorization for UAS operators with Section 333 exemptions. Today, the FAA announced a new smartphone app that will allow small UAS operators to determine if there are operating restrictions specific to the airspace in which they are planning to fly. Additionally, the agency also announced today that it will be working with three private sector partners to identify ways in which small UAS might be safely operated in populated areas and in unpopulated areas beyond the operator's visual line-of-sight. This could be a highly important initiative as the visual line-of-sight restrictions and the prohibition on operating in populated areas were two of the provisions in the FAA's recently released notice of proposed rulemaking thought to be most limiting to the development of commercial uses for small UAS.

May 6, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

EASA Adds Pilot Training Requirements for Loss of Control Situations

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has announced new training requirements to better prepare pilots employed by European airlines to respond to loss of control situations including stalls and inclement weather.  This training is intended to prevent some of the mistakes believed to have contributed to the 2009 crash of Air France Flight 447. States were recommended to adopt these training requirements last year by ICAO. European carriers will have until May 2016 to become compliant, and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) is producing implementation guidelines to assist the carriers.

May 5, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Monday, May 4, 2015

ICAO Planning Changes to Technical Instructions on Lithium Battery Packaging

The ICAO Dangerous Goods Panel met last week, and has reportedly agreed to consider proposals for amending the packaging standards for lithium batteries. The batteries create a potential fire hazard that has caused multiple carriers to self-impose restrictions on their transport. The Dangerous Goods Panel's plan appears to be to make specific recommendations late this year in the hopes of securing approval in time to include the changes in the 2017-18 edition of the Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air. 

May 4, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, April 30, 2015

New Issue of IALP

The list of articles for the Spring 2015 edition of Issues in Aviation Law & Policy has been released. Titles and authors are listed below.

  • Pai Zheng, Justifications and Limits of ADIZs under Public International Law          
  • Úna McLaughlin, Identifying Three Waves in the European Commission’s Increasingly Strict Approach to Airline Remedies
  • Philip Donges Snodgrass, Aviation Flags of Convenience: Ireland and the Case of Norwegian Airlines International           
  • Benjamyn Ian Scott, International Suborbital Passenger Transportation: An Analysis of the Current Legal Situation of Transit and Traffic Rights and its Appropriate Regulation           
  • Adejoke O. Adediran, States’ Responsibility Concerning International Civil Aviation Safety: Lessons from the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Air Crash
  • Moses George, Airport Privatization – International Organizations and Emerging Issues
  • Delphine Defossez, Will There Be More Competition After the Single European Sky Is Implemented?

April 30, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

7th Circuit Denies Attempt to Bring EU 261 Claims in U.S. Courts

Earlier this month the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Volodarskiy v. Delta Airlines, affirming the opinion of the Northern District Court of Illinois that Regulation 261/2004 of the European Union (EU 261), which pertains to the rights of airline passengers to certain treatment and possibly compensation for canceled or delayed flights, does not provide for judicial redress outside of the EU Member States.

At issue here was whether a passenger entitled to bring an EU 261 claim could choose to do so in U.S. courts. In a handful of prior cases, plaintiffs have had limited success bring breach of contract claims in U.S. courts against carriers they alleged to have incorporated the compensation requirements of EU 261 into their terms of service. Having conceded at an earlier stage of litigation that such a claim was unavailable in this case, the plaintiffs rather cleverly argued that they should be able to seek to enforce the right of action granted by EU 261 directly in U.S. courts. The text of EU 261 instructs Member States to establish administrative bodies for the purposes of handling EU 261 claims, and permits passengers to seek relief through the "competent courts and bodies." The plaintiffs contended that there is no explicit requirement within the text that passengers that choose to seek relief via courts restrict themselves to the courts of the EU Member States. Evident in both the oral arguments and the written opinion is the court's keen awareness that the likely purpose behind attempting to bring these relatively small value claims in the U.S. is the possibility of combining multiple claims into a high dollar class action. 

Regardless of the motivations behind the case, the question of whether a private right of action  created by an EU regulation with no analogue in U.S. law  should be recognized in U.S. courts is highly interesting. As the court observed on page 8 of its opinion, "It is hard to classify this dispute doctrinally. It has shadings of jurisdiction, venue, and choice-of-law, but it doesn't fit neatly into any of these doctrinal baskets." The court ultimately decided that the text of EU 261 is best interpreted as authorizing a private right of action only within the courts of the EU Member States. The opinion includes some discussion of comity, forum non conveniens, and similar alternative principles on which a decision might have been based, but those appear largely relegated to dicta.

The full opinion can be found here.

April 22, 2015 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)