Monday, April 26, 2010

Customer Friendly Agency

Blog readers may be interested to read Prof. Russell Mill's paper to the Western Political Science Association's 2010 Meeting entitled, The Customer Friendly Agency: A Historical Institutionalist Investigation of the Federal Aviation Administration (Apr. 10, 2010) (available from SSRN here).

In March and April of 2008, the Federal Aviation Administration grounded several hundred aircraft for a mandatory safety audit after news reports surfaced that several Southwest Airlines aircraft had been operating without inspection certifications for over thirty months. Some charged that FAA oversight of the airlines had become lax because of a モcozy relationshipヤ between regulator and industry in which the FAA モcoddled the airlinesヤ). Using the historical institutionalism work of Pierson (2004), this paper explores what role has past policy decisions had in shaping the FAAメs culture, mission and current policies in the area of maintenance oversight. Using interviews, committee testimony, and agency memos, this paper will investigate this conflicting mission by analyzing two of the FAAメs main flight standards programs responsible for ensuring the compliance of airlines in safely maintaining aircraft: The Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) and the Voluntary Disclosure Reporting Program (VDRP). The main argument advanced in this paper is that the mission of the FAA has a built-in conflict of interest to モencourage and foster the development of civil aeronautics and air commerceヤ (Poole 1982) while acting as the main regulator for aviation safety that has resulted in a lack of coordination and regulatory oversight within the agency.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Customer Friendly Agency:


Post a comment