Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Cannibalization may Allow a Cost-inefficient Firm to Earn more than a Cost-effcient Firm in a Duopoly with Two Vertically Differentiated Goods

Ryoma Kitamura (Graduate School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin
University) and Tetsuya Shinkai (School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University) write that Cannibalization may Allow a Cost-inefficient Firm to Earn more than a Cost-effcient Firm in a Duopoly with Two Vertically Differentiated Goods.

ABSTRACT: We consider cannibalization in a duopoly model in which firms with different costs supply two vertically differentiated products in the same market. We find that an increase in the difference in quality between the two goods or a decrease in the marginal cost of the high-quality goods leads to cannibalization, such that the high-quality goods keep out the low-quality goods from the market. We show that, in equilibrium, cannibalization aspects the product line of firms. As a result, an inefficient firm may earn more than the efficient firm. If the difference in the quality of the two goods is small enough, an increase in the production costs of the inefficient firm improves social welfare.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2014/04/cannibalization-may-allow-a-cost-inefficient-firm-to-earn-more-than-a-cost-effcient-firm-in-a-duopol.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a3fcd0455f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cannibalization may Allow a Cost-inefficient Firm to Earn more than a Cost-effcient Firm in a Duopoly with Two Vertically Differentiated Goods :

Comments

Post a comment