Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

The Evolution and Vitality of Merger Presumptions: A Decision-Theoretic Approach

Steve Salop (Georgetown) explores The Evolution and Vitality of Merger Presumptions: A Decision-Theoretic Approach.

ABSTRACT: This article reviews the formulation and evolution of the Philadelphia National Bank anticompetitive presumption through the lens of decision theory and Bayes Law. It explains how the economic theory, empirical evidence and experience are used to determine a presumption and how that presumption interacts with the reliability of relevant evidence to rationally set the appropriate burden of production and burden of persuasion to rebut the presumption. The article applies this reasoning to merger presumptions. It also sketches out a number of non-market share structural factors that might be used to supplement or replace the current legal and enforcement presumptions for mergers. It also discusses the potential for conflicting presumptions and how such conflicts might best be resolved.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2014/02/the-evolution-and-vitality-of-merger-presumptions-a-decision-theoretic-approach.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a511366135970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Evolution and Vitality of Merger Presumptions: A Decision-Theoretic Approach:

Comments

Post a comment