Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Antitrust Enforcement and Regulation. Different Standards but Incentive Coherent?

Alberto Heimler (National School of Administration Italty) asks Antitrust Enforcement and Regulation. Different Standards but Incentive Coherent?

ABSTRACT: Governments play a significant role in determining how markets function and use a variety of policies for this purpose, including economic regulation, trade policy and antitrust. Some of these policies (i.e. trade policy and antitrust) in principle promote competition directly, but sometimes are too intrusive, while others pursue other general interest objectives and in so doing restrict competition, sometimes beyond what is strictly necessary. While in the last few decades antitrust scholars and practitioners have thoroughly emphasized the role of incentives in achieving optimal economic outcomes, even though actual antitrust enforcement has not always been coherent in this respect, such an understanding does not play a similar role in other policy domains. This paper, by discussing selective, but relevant examples, shows how economic regulation, trade policy, intellectual property and antitrust laws have been applied in recent years without considering the compatibility with proper incentive schemes. Some policy changes and legislation reforms are discussed and suggested.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/11/antitrust-enforcement-and-regulation-different-standards-but-incentive-coherent.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019b00035f4d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Antitrust Enforcement and Regulation. Different Standards but Incentive Coherent?:

Comments

Post a comment