Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, October 28, 2013

Standard Setting: Should There Be a Level Playing Field for All FRAND Commitments?

Nadia Soboleva & Lawrence Wu (NERA Economic Consulting) ask Standard Setting: Should There Be a Level Playing Field for All FRAND Commitments?

ABSTRACT: In the past few years, issues related to fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory licensing rates for patents have garnered considerable attention. The issues most often come up in the context of standard-essential patents. However, some FRAND commitments have been undertaken for patents that have not been formally declared as standard essential. In this paper, we consider the development of FRAND-encumbered patents outside the context of a standard-setting organization and the policy issue of whether injunctive relief should apply equally to owners of both types of FRAND-encumbered patents. For ease of exposition, we will refer to two types of FRAND-encumbered patents-SSO FRAND-encumbered patents and non-SSO FRAND-encumbered patents.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/10/standard-setting-should-there-be-a-level-playing-field-for-all-frand-commitments.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019b0029fa06970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Standard Setting: Should There Be a Level Playing Field for All FRAND Commitments?:

Comments

Post a comment