Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, July 19, 2013

Evaluating Unilateral Effects at the Federal Trade Commission: Do Markets Matter?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Malcolm B. Coate, U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Shawn W. Ulrick, U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ask Evaluating Unilateral Effects at the Federal Trade Commission: Do Markets Matter?

ABSTRACT: The 2010 Merger Guidelines highlight unilateral effects analysis as the most prominent theory of concern in differentiated markets. Building on the discussion in the FTC/DOJ Merger Commentaries, the Guidelines tend to marginalize definition of a relevant market. This study evaluates the FTC’s historical record to determine if market-based variables appear to affect policy. Our results, detailed in Tables 3, 4, and 7 highlight the importance of both market-agnostic and market-based explanatory variables. Moreover, competitive effects’ evidence and a focus on price-based competition tends to increase the probability of a unilateral effects finding.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/07/evaluating-unilateral-effects-at-the-federal-trade-commission-do-markets-matter.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01901e37ff19970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Evaluating Unilateral Effects at the Federal Trade Commission: Do Markets Matter?:

Comments

Post a comment