Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, June 24, 2013

THE POST-CARTEL EQUILIBRIUM PUZZLE IN THE GERMAN CEMENT MARKET: A REPLY TO HUSCHELRATH, MULLER, AND VEITH

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Niels Frank (Lademann & Associates GmbH and University of Bayreuth) and Philipp Schliffke offer THE POST-CARTEL EQUILIBRIUM PUZZLE IN THE GERMAN CEMENT MARKET: A REPLY TO HUSCHELRATH, MULLER, AND VEITH.

ABSTRACT: Kai Huschelrath, Kathrin Muller, and Tobias Veith study the German cement cartel that lasted from the beginning of the 1990s until the end of 2001. Using both a during-and-after and a yardstick difference-in-difference approach, they estimate cartel overcharges between 20 percent and 26.5 percent, pointing out that they have explicitly considered alternative post-cartel transition periods. We show that the authors fail to account for the most important aspect of damage estimation in that case—a punishment phase that followed the internal breakdown of the cartel. The result is an estimated overcharge that is more than twice as large as it was estimated during court proceedings. We develop a simple procedure that helps to estimate the length of the post-cartel off-equilibrium period. Using this procedure, we show that any overcharge estimation that is not considering this punishment phase is highly non-robust and yields upward biased overcharge estimates.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/06/the-post-cartel-equilibrium-puzzle-in-the-german-cement-market-a-reply-to-huschelrath-muller-and-vei.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019102521886970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference THE POST-CARTEL EQUILIBRIUM PUZZLE IN THE GERMAN CEMENT MARKET: A REPLY TO HUSCHELRATH, MULLER, AND VEITH:

Comments

Post a comment