Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, June 7, 2013

Comparing the U.S. Class Action Mechanism and Proposed U.K. System: Which Strikes the Right Balance Between Safeguards and Justice?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Sharon Robertson (Cohen Milstein) asks about Comparing the U.S. Class Action Mechanism and Proposed U.K. System: Which Strikes the Right Balance Between Safeguards and Justice?

ABSTRACT: Free enterprise and competition are critical to the success of a market economy. In the United States, the class action mechanism is one of the most effective and efficient means for consumers to play a part in protecting this basic principle. By treating public citizens as "private attorneys general," class actions incentivize aggrieved consumers to ferret out wrongdoing and seek recompense.

In January 2013, the U.K. government's department for Business Innovation and Skills ("BIS") published a response to its 2012 Consultation on options for reform. The response introduced a limited opt-out class action mechanism. While the proposed U.K. class action device bears some similarities to the U.S. system, it also includes some critical differences. The following article provides an overview of both mechanisms and the merits of the same.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/06/comparing-the-us-class-action-mechanism-and-proposed-uk-system-which-strikes-the-right-balance-betwe.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017eeacbe4d6970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Comparing the U.S. Class Action Mechanism and Proposed U.K. System: Which Strikes the Right Balance Between Safeguards and Justice?:

Comments

Post a comment