Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Crime and punishment: When tougher antitrust enforcement leads to higher overcharge

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Sissel Jenseny (Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics), Ola Kvaloyz (University of Stavanger Business School), Trond E. Olsen (Department of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics) and Lars Sorgard (Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics) have posted Crime and punishment: When tougher antitrust enforcement leads to higher overcharge.

ABSTRACT: The economics of crime and punishment postulates that higher punishment leads to lower crime levels, or less severe crime. It is how- ever hard to get empirical support for this rather intuitive relationship. This paper offers a model that can contribute to explain why this is the case. We show that if criminals can spend resources to reduce the probability of being detected, then a higher general punishment level can increase the crime level. In the context of antitrust enforcement, the model shows that competition authorities who attempt to fight cartels by means of tougher sanctions for all offenders may actually lead cartels to increase their overcharge when leniency programs are in place.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/05/crime-and-punishment-when-tougher-antitrust-enforcement-leads-to-higher-overcharge.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee9da250c970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Crime and punishment: When tougher antitrust enforcement leads to higher overcharge:

Comments

Post a comment