Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Critical Considerations on the Commission’s Commitment to the Commitment Procedure

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Florian Wagner-von Papp (UCL) offers his thoughts on Critical Considerations on the Commission’s Commitment to the Commitment Procedure.

ABSTRACT: Article 9 Regulation (EC) 1/2003 introduced the commitment procedure into European Union ("EU") law. What was initially expected to be a marginal modification of the Commission's existing practice, intended to make the informal practice of settling cases more transparent, has since developed into the de facto default type of decision for non-cartel cases. In a speech delivered on March 8, 2013, the Vice President of the European Commission Joaquín Almunia noted with a certain pride that "in the ten years since Regulation 1/2003 gave the commitment option to companies," "[o]ut of 41 decisions taken by the Commission, we have had 15 prohibitions and 26 commitments."

There are various reasons why the Commission has grown fond of the commitment procedure, many of which are perfectly legitimate.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/04/critical-considerations-on-the-commissions-commitment-to-the-commitment-procedure.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017eea3bdd1f970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Critical Considerations on the Commission’s Commitment to the Commitment Procedure:

Comments

Post a comment