Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, March 4, 2013

Volvo Seven Years Later: Williams v. Duke Energy International, Inc.

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Barbara O. Bruckmann (Baker Botts) describes Volvo Seven Years Later: Williams v. Duke Energy International, Inc.

ABSTRACT: The U.S. Supreme Court has had immense influence on the development of antitrust law in the lower courts, as seen most recently in their response to the Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Trinko, and Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. That cannot be said of its decision in Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. ReederSimco GMC, Inc. —its most recent opinion construing the Robinson-Patman Act, the principal federal antitrust statute addressing pricing discrimination. In the seven years since its issuance, Volvo has had only a marginal impact on the development of RP law. This remarkable phenomenon was illustrated again by the Sixth Circuit’s 2012 decision in Williams v. Duke Energy International, Inc.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/03/volvo-seven-years-later-williams-v-duke-energy-international-inc.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017d4170fc5c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Volvo Seven Years Later: Williams v. Duke Energy International, Inc.:

Comments

Post a comment