Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Probability, Confidence, and Matsushita: The Misunderstood Summary Judgment Revolution

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Luke Meier, Baylor University - Law School discusses Probability, Confidence, and Matsushita: The Misunderstood Summary Judgment Revolution.

ABSTRACT: This article offers a reinterpretation of the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corporation. Although the Matsushita decision is often credited for ushering in a new era of summary judgment by shifting power from the jury to trial court judges, this conclusion is based on an erroneous understanding of the case. In reality, Matsushita is a narrow decision that does not alter the relationship between judge and jury. Appreciating the true import of Matsushita is possible only by delineating between the concepts of probability and confidence. The Supreme Court’s decision in Matsushita is usually understood as having been decided according to a probability analysis, but the best interpretation of the case is that it was decided pursuant to a confidence analysis. Recognizing the true basis of the Matsushita decision dispels the popular belief that Matsushita requires an aggressive use of summary judgment by trial judges. In addition, properly understanding Matsushita is the key to comprehending the pleading requirement of “plausibility,” introduced by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/02/probability-confidence-and-matsushita-the-misunderstood-summary-judgment-revolution.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c363f806e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Probability, Confidence, and Matsushita: The Misunderstood Summary Judgment Revolution:

Comments

Post a comment