Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Plurality Regulations – Still a Wise Market Intervention?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Robert Kenney (Communications Chambers) asks Plurality Regulations – Still a Wise Market Intervention?

ABSTRACT: Plurality rules have long been used to ensure diverse ownership of media, with the expectation that this leads to the availability of diverse news coverage to citizens, which in turn supports democratic discourse. In several countries there is current debate as to whether plurality rules need to be strengthened, and particularly so in the United Kingdom, where News' bid for Sky and the subsequent phone-hacking scandal have brought plurality issues to the fore. However, fundamental developments in the market mean that the costs of plurality interventions are rising, and the benefits are falling. This paper examines how the costs and benefits of plurality regulation are changing, using the United Kingdom as a case study.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Plurality Regulations – Still a Wise Market Intervention?:


Post a comment