January 29, 2013
Antitrust and Nonexcluding Ties
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Herb Hovenkamp has written on Antitrust and Nonexcluding Ties.
ABSTRACT: Notwithstanding hundreds of court decisions and scholarly articles, tying arrangements remain enigmatic. Conclusions that go to either extreme, per se legality or per se illegality, invariably make simplifying assumptions that frequently do not obtain. For example, by ignoring double marginalization or tying product price cuts it becomes very easy to prove that a wide-range of ties are anticompetitive. At the other extreme, by ignoring foreclosure possibilities one can readily conclude that ties are invariably benign. Even when one considers consumer welfare alone, the great majority of ties very likely are competitively benign, with a few exceptions that involve realistic threats of anticompetitive foreclosure.
January 29, 2013 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Antitrust and Nonexcluding Ties: