Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

An Empirical Investigation of the Mergers Decision Process in Australia

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Robert V. Breunig, Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences (RSSS) - Economics Program, Flavio M. Menezes, University of Queensland - School of Economics and Kelvin Jui Keng Tan University of Queensland - Business School undertake An Empirical Investigation of the Mergers Decision Process in Australia.

ABSTRACT: In this article, we examine a database assembled from an Australian public register of 553 merger decisions taken between March 2004 and July 2008. Mergers may be accepted without public assessment, accepted in conjunction with publication of a Public Competition Assessment, or rejected. The public register contains qualitative information about the reasons given by the regulator for each decision. We estimate an ordered probit model, using these three possible outcomes, with the objective of gaining a better insight into the regulator’s decision‐making process. Our two major findings are: (i) the existence of entry barriers and the existence of undertakings are highly correlated with the regulator’s decision to closely scrutinise a merger proposal; and (ii) if we compare two decisions, one which does not mention entry barriers (or import competition) with a decision that does mention entry barriers (or import competition), then the latter is significantly more likely to be opposed than the former.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/01/an-empirical-investigation-of-the-mergers-decision-process-in-australia.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c3480e215970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference An Empirical Investigation of the Mergers Decision Process in Australia:

Comments

Post a comment