Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Tim Wu (Columbia Law) is Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most.

ABSTRACT: Now is a particularly important time to consider the relationship between antitrust and innovation. Both US and European antitrust en forcement authorities are taking a look at the state of competition on the Internet, an inquiry that puts into clear focus the need for antitrust to take seriously its relationship with innovation policy. How would the enforcement of antitrust look if the promotion of innovation were its paramount concern? I present 3 suggestions: (1) law enforcement would be primarily concerned with the exclusion of competitors. (2) A competition law centered on promoting innovation would take very seriously its oversight of "innovation catalysts." Oversight of standard setting, platforms, and patents would be of paramount importance. (3) The timing of intervention would become a more crucial issue than it is today — as a matter of prosecutorial discretion considered independent of illegality.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/11/taking-innovation-seriously-antitrust-enforcement-if-innovation-mattered-most.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c32f0a2c1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most:

Comments

Post a comment