Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Natural Monopoly and Distorted Competition: Evidence from Unbundling Fiber-Optic Networks

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Naoaki Minamihashi (Bank of Canada) addresses Natural Monopoly and Distorted Competition: Evidence from Unbundling Fiber-Optic Networks.

ABSTRACT: Can regulation solve problems arising from a natural monopoly? This paper analyzes whether “unbundling,” referring to regulations that enforce sharing of natural monopolistic infrastructure, prevents entrants from building new infrastructure. It models and estimates a dynamic entry game to evaluate the effects of regulation, using a dataset for construction of fiber-optic networks in Japan. The counterfactual exercise shows that forced unbundling regulation leads to a 24% decrease in the incidence of new infrastructure builders. This suggests, therefore, that when a new technology is being diffused, regulation to remove a natural monopoly conversely involves risks that regulated monopolists’ shares will increase.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/11/natural-monopoly-and-distorted-competition-evidence-from-unbundling-fiber-optic-networks.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee3e43436970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Natural Monopoly and Distorted Competition: Evidence from Unbundling Fiber-Optic Networks:

Comments

Post a comment