« Use and Abuse of Competition Law in Pursuit of the Single Market - Has Competition Law Served as Regulation Subject to a Quasi Industrial Policy Agenda? | Main | How Important is the Distinction in Article 101 TFEU between Agreements that Restrict Competition by Object and Those that Restrict by Effect? »
November 13, 2012
Is Competition Always Good?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Maurice Stucke (Tennessee) asks Is Competition Always Good?
ABSTRACT: Competition is the backbone of U.S. economic policy. The U.S. Supreme Court observed, “The heart of our national economic policy long has been faith in the value of competition.” Competition advocacy is also thriving internationally. Promoting competition is broadly accepted as the best available tool for promoting consumer well-being. Competition officials, who regularly try to protect the public from anticompetitive special interest legislation, are justifiably jaded about complaints of excess competition. Although the economic crisis has prompted some policymakers to reconsider basic assumptions, the virtues of competition are not among them.
Nonetheless to effectively advocate competition, officials must understand when competition itself is the problem's cause, not its cure. Market competition, while harming some participants, often benefits society. But does competition always benefit society? This is antitrust’s blind spot. After outlining the virtues of competition, and discussing some well-accepted exceptions to competition law, this Article addresses four scenarios where competition yields a suboptimal result.
November 13, 2012 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Competition Always Good?: