Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES USED TO EVALUATE COMPETITION POLICY

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Stephen W. Davies and Peter L. Ormosi (both University of East Anglia) offer A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES USED TO EVALUATE COMPETITION POLICY.

ABSTRACT: Research by academics and competition agencies on evaluating competition policy has grown rapidly during the last two decades. This article surveys the literature in order to (1) assess the fitness of the main quantitative methodologies employed and (2) identify the main undeveloped areas and unanswered questions for future research. It suggests that policy evaluation is necessarily an imprecise science and that all existing methodologies have strengths and limitations. The areas where the need is most pressing for further work include: understanding why abuse of dominance cases are only infrequently evaluated; the need to bring conscious discussion of the counterfactual firmly into the foreground; and a wider definition of policy to include success in deterrence and detection. At the heart of the discussion is the impact of selection bias on most aspects of evaluation.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/11/a-comparative-assessment-of-methodologies-used-to-evaluate-competition-policy.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee4605534970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES USED TO EVALUATE COMPETITION POLICY:

Comments

Post a comment