« Joseph Wayland, "Recent Activities of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division, including the ATT – T-Mobile Merger Challenge and the Division’s Renewed Focus on Litigation" Wednesday, October 10, 2012 | Main | Economic Efficiency: The Sole Concern of Modern Antitrust Policy? Non-efficiency Considerations under Article 101 TFEU »
October 2, 2012
Antitrust Enforcement Regimes: Fundamental Differences
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Keith Hylton (BU) discusses Antitrust Enforcement Regimes: Fundamental Differences.
ABSTRACT: Since China has modeled its antitrust regime on that of the EU, there are essentially two antitrust regime types: the U.S. and the EU. This chapter is a brief comparative study of the two regimes. I focus on three categories in which fundamental differences are observed: enforcement, legal standards, and procedure. Within each of the three categories, I narrow the focus to a specific illustrative feature. With respect to enforcement, the EU imposes gain-based penalties while the U.S. imposes harm-based penalties. In predation law, the U.S. has a marginal cost standard and the EU has an average cost standard. With respect to procedure, the U.S. is a common law system, while the EU’s procedure is closer to the civil law system in its allocation of power between the courts and the enforcement agency. These differences have profound implications for the welfare consequences of global antitrust enforcement.
October 2, 2012 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Antitrust Enforcement Regimes: Fundamental Differences: