Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, September 24, 2012

The Constitutionality of Administrative Monetary Penalties Under the Competition Act: Is Rowan a Full Answer?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

John A. Campion & Antonio Di Domenico (Fasken Martineau) ask The Constitutionality of Administrative Monetary Penalties Under the Competition Act: Is Rowan a Full Answer?

ABSTRACT: Administrative Monetary Penalties ("AMPs") are monetary penalties where payment is ordered by a decision maker acting under a statutory power. AMPs are popular among regulators, including the Commissioner of Competition, because they fill the gap between true administrative remedies and criminal sanctions. They allow regulators to collect considerable sums without having to prove their cases on the "beyond a reasonable doubt" criminal standard. However, some AMPs are so large that they arguably amount to penal sanctions, triggering constitutional protections under the Canadian Charter of Freedoms.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/09/the-constitutionality-of-administrative-monetary-penalties-under-the-competition-act-is-rowan-a-full.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017d3c47ed12970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Constitutionality of Administrative Monetary Penalties Under the Competition Act: Is Rowan a Full Answer?:

Comments

Post a comment