Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, August 31, 2012

Why a Reduction in Health Care Costs Per Se May be a Misleading Policy Objective

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Rosa Abrantes-Metz (Global Economics Group) explains Why a Reduction in Health Care Costs Per Se May be a Misleading Policy Objective.

ABSTRACT: There is nearly universal agreement that a restructuring of the health care system is required, particularly with regard to the public financing of health care. Longevity has greatly increased, and the current public health care programs are not designed to sustainably afford such life-long additional expenses. But the policy discussions are almost always in terms of the total cost of health care, which is not, per se, a socially useful metric. Costs can rise for a number of good, socially desirable reasons.

In this article I argue that, instead, policy should focus on the price per constant quality of health care. There are reasons to think that prices may be inefficient in this market, and there may be policy options that could address that. Allowing for interstate competition between insurance companies would likely reduce premiums and significantly reduce health care costs.

Still, even "reducing price" must be attempted judiciously. Measures punishing innovation may allow for lower prices in the present, but to the extent they discourage current R&D, they will represent a large social cost in the future.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/08/why-a-reduction-in-health-care-costs-per-se-may-be-a-misleading-policy-objective.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017743d465db970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why a Reduction in Health Care Costs Per Se May be a Misleading Policy Objective:

Comments

Post a comment