Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, August 10, 2012

Reverse-Payment Settlements: Presumptively Bad or Usually Acceptable?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

C. Kyle Musgrove & Richard Ripley (Haynes and Boone) ask Reverse-Payment Settlements: Presumptively Bad or Usually Acceptable?

ABSTRACT: In April 2012, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") suffered yet another rebuke of what FTC Chair Jon Leibowitz has characterized as "one of the Commission's top competition priorities," i.e., stopping "reverse payment" settlements in drug patent litigation. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in the AndroGel case presents an opportunity to review the concept of reverse payment settlements, the agency's persistent condemnation of these agreements, the courts' near-unanimous endorsement of the concept, and assess which side holds the better hand.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/08/reverse-payment-settlements-presumptively-bad-or-usually-acceptable.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef016768008900970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reverse-Payment Settlements: Presumptively Bad or Usually Acceptable?:

Comments

Post a comment