Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

EU Merger Remedies and Competition Concerns: An Empirical Assessment

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Wei Wang, AAlto University School of Economics and Matti Rudanko offer EU Merger Remedies and Competition Concerns: An Empirical Assessment.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of merger remedies is to relieve the potential competitive detriments as to preserve the efficiencies. The European Community (EC) Merger Remedies Notice requires remedies able to remove the identified competition concerns entirely and proportionately. The scope of each merger remedy package is confined by the competition concern in question. This study analyses, from an empirical point of view, the relationship between competition concerns and merger remedies. It reviews all remedies accepted in Phase II EU merger investigation and categorises them into seven sets according to their nature. Results of the empirical assessment present the frequencies of each remedy type accepted for resolving various competitions concerns and reveal that merger remedy design does vary for different competition concerns. Horizontal effects require divestiture remedies more. Other structural remedies, especially access commitment and supply commitment, have a good chance to be accepted in resolving vertical and conglomerate effects.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/08/eu-merger-remedies-and-competition-concerns-an-empirical-assessment.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef016768b9a842970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference EU Merger Remedies and Competition Concerns: An Empirical Assessment:

Comments

Post a comment