Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, May 28, 2012

REPUTATIONAL PENALTIES TO FIRMS IN ANTITRUST INVESTIGATIONS

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Stijn van den Broek,; Ron G.M. Kemp,; Willem F.C. Verschoor,; and Anne-Claire de Vries (NMA) report on REPUTATIONAL PENALTIES TO FIRMS IN ANTITRUST INVESTIGATIONS.

ABSTRACT: We estimate the impact of legal penalties imposed on Dutch listed firms targeted by competition authorities from 1998 to 2008 on a firm's stock market value. On average, firms lose 2.3 percent of their market values when an antitrust investigation is uncovered. This corresponds to a total value loss of €4.3 billion. Overall, the fines imposed by the legal system contribute to only 12 percent of this total value loss. Another 55 percent of the total value loss is explained by the lost conspiracy-generated profits. We find that the residual 33 percent of the total value loss is explained by reputation loss. Thus, cartel offenders are disciplined largely through market-induced reputational penalties, not through legal penalties.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/05/reputational-penalties-to-firms-in-antitrust-investigations.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01630543d83c970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference REPUTATIONAL PENALTIES TO FIRMS IN ANTITRUST INVESTIGATIONS:

Comments

Post a comment