Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Can the Failing Firm Defense Rule be Counterproductive?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Helder Vasconcelos (Faculdade de Economia do Porto), asks Can the Failing Firm Defense Rule be Counterproductive?

ABSTRACT: This paper studies the role of the failing firm defense (FFD) concept in merger control in a Cournot setting where: (i) endogenous mergers are motivated by prospective efficiency gains; and (ii) mergers must be submitted to an Antitrust Authority which might require partial divestiture for approval. It is shown that when the FFD concept is available in merger control, firms can strategically embark on a merger which makes other firms fail and then buy over the exiting outsider firm(s), leading to complete monopolization of the industry. This in turn implies that, in some circumstances, the consumers'-surplus-maximizing market structure cannot be achieved if the FFD concept is available, whereas it would be achieved if the FFD concept were ruled out.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/05/can-the-failing-firm-defense-rule-be-counterproductive.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e9c404bf970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Can the Failing Firm Defense Rule be Counterproductive?:

Comments

Post a comment