Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, March 29, 2012

The ‘Feedback Effect’ of Applying EU Competition Law to Regulated Industries: Doctrinal Contamination in the Case of Margin Squeeze

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Hendrik Auf'mkolk (University of Munster) describes The ‘Feedback Effect’ of Applying EU Competition Law to Regulated Industries: Doctrinal Contamination in the Case of Margin Squeeze.

ABSTRACT: Applying EU competition law to industries under sector-specific regulation can have ‘feedback effects’ on its substantive principles if the two regimes and their respective goals and standards of intervention are not clearly distinguished. The emergence of a standalone rule against margin squeeze under EU competition law based on regulatory models of access pricing is a case in point. An overly broad competition law rule may chill legitimate price competition and discriminate against vertically integrated firms, particularly in markets that lack the economic characteristics of regulated network industries.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/03/the-feedback-effect-of-applying-eu-competition-law-to-regulated-industries-doctrinal-contamination-i.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e879c1ce970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The ‘Feedback Effect’ of Applying EU Competition Law to Regulated Industries: Doctrinal Contamination in the Case of Margin Squeeze:

Comments

Post a comment