Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Experimentation in Two-Sided Markets

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Martin Peitz (Department of Economics, University of Mannheim), Sven Rady (Department of Economics, University of Bonn), and Piers Trepper (Department of Economics, University of Munich) are writing on Experimentation in Two-Sided Markets.

ABSTRACT: We study optimal experimentation by a monopolistic platform in a two-sided market framework. The platform provider faces uncertainty about the strength of the externality each side is exerting on the other. It maximizes the expected present value of its profit stream in a continuous-time infinite-horizon framework by setting participation fees or quantities on both sides. We show that a price-setting platform provider sets a fee lower than the myopically optimal level on at least one side of the market, and on both sides if the two externalities are of approximately equal strength. If the externality that one side exerts is sufficiently weaker than the externality it experiences, the optimal fee on this side exceeds the myopically optimal level. We obtain analogous results for expected prices when the platform provider chooses quantities. While the optimal policy does not admit closed-form representations in general, we ! identify special cases in which the undiscounted limit of the model can be solved in closed form.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/01/experimentation-in-two-sided-markets-2.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01675ee81a6d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Experimentation in Two-Sided Markets:

Comments

Post a comment