Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, December 5, 2011

Is There Life after Death for Sports League Immunity? American Needle and Beyond

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Meir Feder, Jones Day asks Is There Life after Death for Sports League Immunity? American Needle and Beyond.

ABSTRACT: American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League decisively rejected the argument that a professional sports league is a “single entity” exempt from Section I antitrust scrutiny, yet this immunity argument had barely been interred before some commentators sought to articulate alternative grounds for immunizing sports leagues and other joint ventures from scrutiny. This Essay argues that these new theories of sports league immunity – one of them based on American Needle itself, and another rooted in an enigmatic statement by the Supreme Court, in Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, about the “core functions” of joint ventures – are inconsistent with both American Needle and with bedrock principles of antitrust law.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/12/is-there-life-after-death-for-sports-league-immunity-american-needle-and-beyond.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef015392b1d8bd970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is There Life after Death for Sports League Immunity? American Needle and Beyond:

Comments

Post a comment