Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Thursday, November 17, 2011

The Increasing Role of Economic Evidences in Prosecution of Cartels

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Murtuza Bohra, National Law Institute University (NLIU), Bhopal has written on The Increasing Role of Economic Evidences in Prosecution of Cartels.

ABSTRACT: People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice. (Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776) The aforesaid statement was said in the 18th century but it still holds some water in the 21st century. The only thing which has changed is that we have come closer to bind perpetrators of such conspiracies by making our rules more comprehensive through a mature understanding of law. The competition law1 which is commonly known as anti-trust law has always been a tough law to implement for any country because of the plethora of challenges. One of those challenges posed is by the unavailability of evidences in the prosecution of cartels. Cartels are 'the most egregious violations of competition law. The intention of this paper is to explore this challenge and also to study the role of economic evidences as a special case of development in the antitrust litigation.

Further, this paper has undertook a special case of EU and US antitrust laws and cases decided to discuss the aforesaid issue. At last the Indian perspective has dealt discussing the nature of growth of competition law in India.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Increasing Role of Economic Evidences in Prosecution of Cartels:


Post a comment