November 3, 2011
Mom-and-Pop Meet Big Box: Complements or Substitutes?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
John Haltiwanger, University of Maryland - Department of Economics, Ron S. Jarmin, U.S. Census Bureau, and C. J. Krizan, U.S. Census Bureau - Center for Economic Studies ask Mom-and-Pop Meet Big Box: Complements or Substitutes?
ABSTRACT: In part due to the popular perception that Big-Boxes displace smaller, often family owned (a.k.a. Mom-and-Pop) retail establishments, several empirical studies have examined the evidence on how Big-Boxes’ impact local retail employment but no clear consensus has emerged. To help shed light on this debate, we exploit establishment-level data with detailed location information from a single metropolitan area to quantify the impact of Big-Box store entry and growth on nearby single unit and local chain stores. We incorporate a rich set of controls for local retail market conditions as well as whether or not the Big-Boxes are in the same sector as the smaller stores. We find a substantial negative impact of Big-Box entry and growth on the employment growth at both single unit and especially smaller chain stores – but only when the Big-Box activity is both in the immediate area and in the same detailed industry.
November 3, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mom-and-Pop Meet Big Box: Complements or Substitutes?: