Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, October 14, 2011

"SIR"CHES AND SEIZURES: ARE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUESTS UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Joshua A. Krane (Blakes) has written on "SIR"CHES AND SEIZURES: ARE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUESTS UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

ABSTRACT: This paper addresses a simple question: Is merger review by the Commissioner of Competition and the Competition Bureau so pressing and important that it justifies warrantless searches? In particular, the paper examines whether the legislation providing for the issuance by the Commissioner of supplemental information requests (SIRs) under s. 114(2) of the Competition Act (the “Act”)
meets the standards for a constitutional search and seizure under s. 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. For a warrantless search to be constitutionally valid, it must be authorized by law and be reasonable. Based on a review of the
constitutional law on unreasonable searches and seizures under s. 8 there are serious questions about whether the SIR process does, indeed, rise to those standards.

Download CBLJ51-2 Krane

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/10/sirches-and-seizures-are-supplementary-information-requests-unconstitutional.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0153918a8581970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "SIR"CHES AND SEIZURES: ARE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUESTS UNCONSTITUTIONAL?:

Comments

Post a comment