Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Use of Market Power and Counterfactuals in New Zealand and Australian Competition Laws

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Cento Veljanovski, Case Associates, Institute of Economic Affairs, Centre for Regulation and Market Analysis (CRMA) and Roger Featherston, have posted Use of Market Power and Counterfactuals in New Zealand and Australian Competition Laws.

ABSTRACT: These two papers look at recent decisions and controversies surrounding the counterfactual test under s 36 of the New Zealand Commerce Act 1986, and s46 of the Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 respectively. In 2010 the New Zealand Supreme Court in 0867 affirmed the counterfactual as the test to determine whether there has been a ‘use’ of market power (the equivalent of monopolisation under the Sherman Act, or abuse of dominance under Article 102TFEU) for a proscribed purpose. Veljanovski’s paper traces through the development of the s36 counterfactual, and concludes that it is flawed and potentially underinclusive. Featherston examines the development of and problems associated with the Australian equivalent s46 counterfactual and its relevance to New Zealand. Both papers were delivered at the 25th Competition Policy and Law Institute of New Zealand (CPLINZ) conference held in Wellington in August 2011.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/09/use-of-market-power-and-counterfactuals-in-new-zealand-and-australian-competition-laws.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef015390d22fba970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Use of Market Power and Counterfactuals in New Zealand and Australian Competition Laws:

Comments

Post a comment