Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, September 19, 2011

The Antitrust Implications of Licensed Occupations Choosing Their Own Exclusive Jurisdiction

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Jarod M. Bona, DLA Piper discusses The Antitrust Implications of Licensed Occupations Choosing Their Own Exclusive Jurisdiction.

ABSTRACT: State and local government restraints, with a few exceptions, receive little attention from the antitrust laws because they are limited by the "state action immunity" doctrine. These public restraints take many forms, from limiting the number of taxicab licenses in a city to professional advertising restrictions to actual price or output limitations. This article focuses on state and local licensing restrictions. In doing so, it examines two instances where state boards that are predominantly made up of licensed occupations enact policies that expand the sphere of commerce that is reserved by law to these occupations. These examples present compelling circumstances for antitrust regulation because the deciding state entity is dominated by members with private incentives to expand the scope of their occupation to the detriment of consumers.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/09/the-antitrust-implications-of-licensed-occupations-choosing-their-own-exclusive-jurisdiction.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef015391b85c5d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Antitrust Implications of Licensed Occupations Choosing Their Own Exclusive Jurisdiction:

Comments

Post a comment