Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, June 13, 2011

Unilateral Effects Analysis and the Upward Pricing Pressure Model: Evidence from the Federal Trade Commission

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Malcolm B. Coate (FTC) addresses Unilateral Effects Analysis and the Upward Pricing Pressure Model: Evidence from the Federal Trade Commission.

ABSTRACT: This paper explores the Federal Trade Commission’s unilateral effects analysis from the perspectives of both the 1992 and 2010 Merger Guidelines. Historical enforcement data is used to define a diversion benchmark of 30 percent, but is unable to detect a role for the margin variable. A related analysis shows a deterministic model based on the number of significant rivals appears to out-perform alternative structural proxies. Case study evidence explores the factors that tend to affect the implications of the structural model, with evidence showing diversions are low suggesting closing merger investigations involving few rivals, while evidence of high diversions supports a challenge even in the presence of an unusually high number of rivals. A broader case study identifies a range of considerations under which a unilateral effects model should not be applied to a differentiated products merger. This paper is a reorganized and streamlined version of an earlier working paper "Counting Rivals or Measuring Share: Modeling Unilateral Effects for Merger Analysis," 2011, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722846.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/06/unilateral-effects-analysis-and-the-upward-pricing-pressure-model-evidence-from-the-federal-trade-co.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e8882a243970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unilateral Effects Analysis and the Upward Pricing Pressure Model: Evidence from the Federal Trade Commission:

Comments

Post a comment