Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, May 27, 2011

The Institutional Framework for Doing Sports Business: Principles of EU Competition Policy in Sports Markets

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Oliver Budzinski (Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark) discusses The Institutional Framework for Doing Sports Business: Principles of EU Competition Policy in Sports Markets.

ABSTRACT: The competition rules and policy framework of the European Union represents an important institutional restriction for doing sports business. Driven by the courts, the 2007 overhaul of the approach and methodology has increased the scope of competition policy towards sports associations and clubs. Nowadays, virtually all activities of sports associations that govern and organize a sports discipline with business elements are subject to antitrust rules. This includes genuine sporting rules that are essential for a league, championship or tourna-ment to come into existence. Of course, ‘real’ business or commercial activities like ticket selling, marketing of broadcasting rights, etc. also have to comply with competition rules. Regulatory activities of sports associations comply with European competition rules if they pursuit a legitimate objective, its restrictive effects are inherent to that objective and proportionat! e to it. This new approach offers important orientation for the strategy choice of sports associations, clubs and related enterprises. Since this assessment is done following a case-by-case approach, however, neither a blacklist of anticompetitive nor a whitelist of procompetitive sporting rules can be derived. Instead, conclusions can be drawn only from the existing case decisions – but, unfortunately, this leaves many aspects open. With respect to business activities, the focus of European competition policy is on centralized marketing arrangements bundling media rights. These constitute cartels and are viewed to be anticompetitive in nature. However, they may be exempted from the cartel prohibition on efficiency and consumer benefits considerations. Here, a detailed list of conditions exists that centralized marketing arrangements must comply with in order to be legal. Although this policy seems to be well-developed at first sight, a closer look at the decision practic! e reveals several open problems. Other areas of the buying and selling behavior of sports associations and related enterprises are considerably less well-developed and do not provide much orientation for business. The author would like to thank Arne Feddersen and the participants of the 2nd European Conference on Sports Economics (German Sports University Cologne, 2010) for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/05/the-institutional-framework-for-doing-sports-business-principles-of-eu-competition-policy-in-sports--1.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e8848dc99970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Institutional Framework for Doing Sports Business: Principles of EU Competition Policy in Sports Markets :

Comments

great post! this is very much informative and influential. Thank you for the post!

Posted by: Adventure Racing | Jun 12, 2011 7:57:03 PM

Post a comment