Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Competition Law, Antitrust Immunity and Profits: A Dynamic Panel Analysis

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Erik Brouwer, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) and Fatih Cemil Ozbugday, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC), Tilburg University - Department of Economics address Competition Law, Antitrust Immunity and Profits: A Dynamic Panel Analysis.

ABSTRACT: This paper tests whether the transition from the old Economic Competition Act, which was based on the so-called “abuse system”, to the new Competition Act, which was based on “prohibition system”, in the Netherlands had an impact on the price-cost margins in manufacturing industries during the period 1993-2007. The paper further investigates if the price-cost margins were higher in industries where temporary antitrust immunity was granted for subset of firms that engaged in concerted practices. The results indicate that the change in the competition law in the Netherlands had a very small and negative, yet statistically insignificant deterrent effect on the price-cost margins. Elsewhere, markups were higher in industries in which temporary antitrust immunity was granted for some class of coordinated actions.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/05/competition-law-antitrust-immunity-and-profits-a-dynamic-panel-analysis.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0147e42a9939970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Competition Law, Antitrust Immunity and Profits: A Dynamic Panel Analysis:

Comments

Post a comment