« Airport Congestion Pricing and its Welfare Implications: The Case of Variable Passenger Time Costs | Main | Empirical Analysis of Inter-Firm Rivalry between Japanese Full-Service and Low-Cost Carriers »
March 10, 2011
Oligopoly as a Socially Embedded Dilemma: An Experiment
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Christoph Engel, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods and Lilia Zhurakhovska, describe Oligopoly as a Socially Embedded Dilemma: An Experiment.
ABSTRACT: From the perspective of competitors, competition may be modeled as a prisoner’s dilemma. Setting the monopoly price is cooperation, undercutting is defection. Jointly, competitors are better off if both are faithful to a cartel. Individually, profit is highest if only the competitor(s) is (are) loyal to the cartel. Yet collusion inflicts harm on the opposite market side and, through the deadweight loss, on society at large. Moreover, almost all legal orders combat cartels. Through the threat with antitrust intervention, gains from cooperation are uncertain. In the field, both qualifications combine. To prevent participants from using their world knowledge about antitrust, we experimentally test them on a neutral matrix game, with either a negative externality on a third participant, uncertainty about gains from cooperation, or both. Uncertainty dampens cooperation, though only slightly. Surprisingly, externalities are immaterial. If we control for beliefs, they even foster cooperation. If we combine both qualifications and do not control for beliefs, we only find an uncertainty effect. If we add beliefs as a control variable, we only find that externalities enhance cooperation, even if gains from collusion are uncertain. Hence the fact that the dilemma of oligopolists is socially embedded matters less than one might have expected.
March 10, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Oligopoly as a Socially Embedded Dilemma: An Experiment: