« Transplanting Antitrust in China: Economic Transition, Market Structure, and State Control | Main | The New EU Competition Rules for the Assessment of Horizontal Agreements »
February 18, 2011
Horizontal Mergers, Structural Remedies, and Consumer Welfare in a Cournot Oligopoly with Assets
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Thibaud Verg - Autorité de la Concurrence and CREST-LEI discusses Horizontal Mergers, Structural Remedies, and Consumer Welfare in a Cournot Oligopoly with Assets.
ABSTRACT: Competition authorities sometimes require that firms divest some of their assets to rivals in order to allow a merger to take place. This paper extends the results of Farrell and Shapiro [1990a] and shows that, in the absence of technological synergies, a merger is highly unlikely to benefit consumers, even if it is subjected to appropriate structural remedies. For instance, a merger may ultimately lead to a lower price only if at least two different firms acquire the divested assets, and if the merging parties had relatively important pre-merger market shares.
February 18, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0147e1be6322970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Horizontal Mergers, Structural Remedies, and Consumer Welfare in a Cournot Oligopoly with Assets:
