Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Does the Packers and Stockyards Act Require Antitrust Harm?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Herb Hovenkamp (Iowa Law) asks Does the Packers and Stockyards Act Require Antitrust Harm?

ABSTRACT: The Packers and Stockyards Act was enacted in 1921. Congress was plainly influenced by the 1919 publication of a Federal Trade Commission Report on the meatpacking industry. Consistent with the FTC’s jurisdiction and concerns, the Report dealt with deceptive and unfair practices as well as practices that were believed to violate the antitrust laws. The language of the PSA does much the same, mixing the two. Of its seven specific prohibitions, three contain antitrust-like provisions requiring a lessening of competition. Two others reach unfair and tort-like conduct without any requirement of harm to competition. The remaining two reach both anticompetitive and tortuous conspiracies. One of the conspiracy provisions plainly reaches price fixing and market division agreements. The other plainly reaches a full range of tortious and anticompetitive conduct without stating a harm to competition requirement.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/02/does-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-require-antitrust-harm.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0147e1d41d35970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does the Packers and Stockyards Act Require Antitrust Harm?:

Comments

Post a comment