Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

More Ian Norris - 3rd Circuit Appeals brief on whether outside counsel can serve as a "conduit" to the grand jury of a false statement

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

There is an interesting crim law - antitrust intersection development in the Ian Norris case.  See the recent story in Corporate Counsel Magazine.  The policy question is whether an outside counsel can serve as a "conduit" to the grand jury of a false statement. That is, is any omission of a fact to your defense attorney equivalent to false testimony before the grand jury?

I attach Appealant's brief (authored by the White & Case team of J Mark Gidley and Christopher M Curran). Download 2011-01-21_Appellant's_Brief[1]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/01/more-ian-norris-3rd-circuit-appeals-brief-on-whether-outside-counsel-can-serve-as-a-conduit-to-the-g.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0147e1f78947970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Ian Norris - 3rd Circuit Appeals brief on whether outside counsel can serve as a "conduit" to the grand jury of a false statement:

Comments

Post a comment