Tuesday, January 25, 2011
More Ian Norris - 3rd Circuit Appeals brief on whether outside counsel can serve as a "conduit" to the grand jury of a false statement
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
There is an interesting crim law - antitrust intersection development in the Ian Norris case. See the recent story in Corporate Counsel Magazine. The policy question is whether an outside counsel can serve as a "conduit" to the grand jury of a false statement. That is, is any omission of a fact to your defense attorney equivalent to false testimony before the grand jury?
I attach Appealant's brief (authored by the White & Case team of J Mark Gidley and Christopher M Curran). Download 2011-01-21_Appellant's_Brief