Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Monday, December 6, 2010

Theories of Harm in the Intel Case

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Patrick DeGraba, Federal Trade Commission - Antitrust I and John David Simpson, The Brattle Group discuss Theories of Harm in the Intel Case.

ABSTRACT: Over the past several years, government competition agencies and private plaintiffs have sued Intel challenging the legality of its relationships with original equipment computer manufacturers (“OEMs”). These lawsuits have combined to produce a detailed account describing Intel’s relationships with OEMs and analyzing the competitive effects of these relationships. This paper uses the public evidence in this account as a starting point for further analysis of both competition in downstream markets and the structure of Intel’s contracts with OEMs. By presenting this additional analysis, this paper seeks to better identify the circumstances under which exclusive contracts can lead to anticompetitive harm.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Theories of Harm in the Intel Case:


Post a comment