December 30, 2010
Standardization of Standard-Form Contracts: Competition and Contract Implications
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Mark Patterson (Fordham Law) has written on Standardization of Standard-Form Contracts: Competition and Contract Implications.
Standard-form contracts are a common feature of commercial relationships because they offer the advantage of lower transaction costs. This advantage of standard contracts is increased when there is a second layer of standardization under which multiple firms agree on a standard contract. Trade associations and similar entities often effect standardization of this kind through collective agreement on a standard contract, sometimes under the aegis of state actors. Multifirm contract standardization can provide not only the usual transaction-cost advantages of standard-form contracts, but also increased competition among firms, because a standard contract makes comparison among firms’ offerings easier. But standardization among firms also eliminates competition on the standardized standardization occurs and discussing the implications of different means of negotiation. Third, the Article considers the possibilities both of voluntary adoption of contracts and of adoption incentives created by private organizations and by the state. The Article then draws on these discussions to suggest some analytical approaches to contract standardization.
December 30, 2010 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Standardization of Standard-Form Contracts: Competition and Contract Implications: