Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, December 27, 2010

Heterogeneous Exits: Evidence from New Firms

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Masatoshi Kato (School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University) and Yuji Honjo (Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University) describe Heterogeneous Exits: Evidence from New Firms.

ABSTRACT: This paper explores heterogeneous exits—bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation, and merger—by focusing on new firms. Using a sample of approximately 16,000 firms founded in Japan during 1997–2004, we examine the determinants of new-firm exit according to forms of exit. Regarding industry-specific characteristics, our findings indicate that new firms in capital-intensive and R&D-intensive industries are less likely to go bankrupt. In industries characterized by large amounts of capital and low price–cost margins, new firms are more likely to exit through voluntary liquidation and merger. Region-specific characteristics, such as regional agglomeration and unemployment rate, have significant effects on the hazards of exit, and their effects vary across different forms of exit. Moreover, we provide evidence that firm-specific characteristics, such as the number of employees, and entrepreneur-specific characteristics, such as educational background and age, play significantly different roles in determining each form of exit.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/12/heterogeneous-exits-evidence-from-new-firms.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0147e0491e7f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heterogeneous Exits: Evidence from New Firms:

Comments

Post a comment