Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Bank Competition and Stability: Reconciling Conflicting Empirical Evidence

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Thorsten Beck, Professor, CentER, European Banking Center, Tilburg University, Olivier De Jonghe, Tilburg University - Department of Finance, Tilburg University - European Banking Center, and Glenn Schepens, Ghent University - Department of Financial Economics address Bank Competition and Stability: Reconciling Conflicting Empirical Evidence.

ABSTRACT: Theoretical models and empirical results offer conflicting evidence on the relationship between bank competition and bank stability. This paper aims to reconcile the seemingly contrasting evidence on the bank competition-bank soundness relationship. We develop a unified framework to assess how regulation, supervision and other institutional factors may make it more likely that the data favor one theory over the other (charter value paradigm versus risk-shifting paradigm). Cross-country heterogeneity in these factors allows us to test the assumptions and predictions of various theoretical models. We show that an increase in competition will have a larger impact on banks' risk taking incentives in countries with stricter activity restrictions, more herding in revenue structure and unconcentrated banking markets.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/12/bank-competition-and-stability-reconciling-conflicting-empirical-evidence.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01348980e7a6970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bank Competition and Stability: Reconciling Conflicting Empirical Evidence:

Comments

Post a comment